![]() We will not be able to support fully working offline due to the structure of the application. RevMan supports working on the same page while you lose internet connection. More detailed info in separate e-mail to follow. I am not aware of this feature in Word, and was not able to see it. There is a global functionality to resolve comment on the whole review, see KB article: Īs we scroll, we get lost sometimes to what section we have reached, can the section heading highlight as we reach it as it is with word Ĭlick on figure or reference within text and it will automatically pop-upĭelete notes? I am erasing the content and then the note disappears You can save am image of the sensitivity analysis. It is a separate feature by design as these types of checks should ideally not impact the analysis in the review. The sensitivity analysis feature allows you to change settings in the analysis and see how it impacts the review. One-click features as with RM5, change from fixed to effect model, change from RR to OR to RD, etc. What do you need this view for? I’m interested in learning more. I would want to view the forest plot with the cells per arm and comparison and not the summary with risk of bias graph by default, currently i click on edit table to see that. Very interesting idea that needs further research to identify quick wins vs changes that have dependencies on other projects. Splitting screen functionality in RMW would likely have the same impact so we’d need to invest in changing the design.Ĭonsistency: auto-population: data carried over to other sections (e.g., outcomes in SoF to be duplicated to abstract, methods, results, discussion We could look at ways to reduce the extra space when using two windows. Split view (opening two tabs kills lots of much needed space) This is available in the view of a version Summarize all outcomes per comparison in one table ![]() See KB article: for description of wide side bar and the tip To accept/reject changes in the next text box, use the tab key twice and then click on the accept/discard option in the track changes dropdown menu. We would need to develop our own track changes UI to implement the way you suggest and that would require a lot of development and testing time. MEs were involved in preparation and sign-off but I understand that it’s not ideal. The solution was a compromise of what the text editor supplies and expectations from RevMan 5. The wide sidebar for track changes was developed to improve the process of resolving track changes. Navigate through the tracked changes directly - clicking next (currently we need to scroll and identify them by eyeballing) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |